Mariner begins a new series of posts that presume some idea is applicable to some process or result that may not be in the mainstream of history, science, or behavior. The posts will occur occasionally and unexpectedly.
Presumption – Over time, preferred geometric forms become ingrained in the genome. True or false?
To present a broad example, very early forms of religion (7,000 years ago or earlier) were not interested in height or divine sexuality until, abruptly, new gene pools from western Turkey and early Greece introduced a preference for vertical structures to express religiosity. The earliest gene populations built structures with rounded domes while later ones, like Egyptians, Babylonians, Mesopotamians and classic Greeks went with super large vertical architecture and focused on kings as gods (more a cultural preference). To a noticeable extent, the change in architecture was a rapid shift in preference for religious edifices; further, from the view of genetic anthropology, it is relatively clear that a new gene pool suddenly changed visual shape preferences.
Another illustration of circles dominating vertical architectures are the giant, geoglyphs discovered in the Peruvian desert; then there’s the example of soaring cathedrals and office buildings in large western cities. We could go on.
On the other end of the European expansion, round edifices were preferred – consider Stonehenge before the Roman occupation…
Another example occurs at the beginning and end of the great migration out of Africa – the one that travels through China, up to Japan and Russia, across the Bering Strait, down through North America and into Central and South America. Compare the architecture of the Xia Dynasty of ancient China to architecture at the end of the migration in Mayan and Aztec cultures – separated by 3,000 years and three continents.
In between were civilizations that did not create similar forms. Instead, one can see that these western civilizations, like the early religions in Turkey and Stonehenge, seemed to prefer round structures. The circle is prevalent in everything from igloos and tepees to religious symbols, to garment decorations to the Peruvian giant circles in the desert. Because these intervening civilizations existed in vast terrains that did not require reactions to mountainous geography, (the civilizations in between lived on islands, flatlands and ocean front) the theologies and godheads were vastly different yet none preferred vertical architecture until mountains were the primary topography.
There are historians who suggest that migrations traveled from the Indonesian area and settled in the middle of South America and are ancestors to a more primitive culture – remnants of which still exist in the great forests, Chile and Peru. However, in the deserts south of the Amazon basin, huge geoglyphs, well above normal size and often based on geometric design, reflect the same pattern of super sizing as the Mesopotamians.
It is agreed that terrain, over time, alters geographic preferences. But over generations, do certain cultural shapes become preferred as well? Darwin’s finches proved that finches developed new beak shapes and in England, feather colors matching local tree colors. Is this true about humans as well?
Can we presume that the genome carries a preference for certain geometric shapes – a preference ingrained over generations?
True or False?
Given the challenge, it will be hard to avoid association with successive generational adaptation.
 The mariner cheats by including large, tall office buildings because they are neither religious edifice nor caused by one’s genome. They exist because there are too many people and not enough space. However, allowed to be taller than a religious edifice, one wonders whether capitalism is the actual religion.
 Weak example; It was a calendar. Nevertheless, circular architecture dominated the British Isles until castles came along.
Might find some more specific information by investigating Sacred Geometry. There seems to be specific geometric shapes that occur naturally in plants, flowers, organs of the body, geological formations, genetic, atomic and celestial structure, etc. So only natural then that maybe we would notice those basic designs and use them for sacred expression. The circle is the simplest and yet most defining symbol. Never ending, all encompassing, universal and found in all cultures and the easiest to understand and express. There might be underlying reasons early structures were made the way they were geometrically. Some say the pyramids are energy or power generators or antenna that were not built for entombing anybody, but for better communication with deities or extraterrestrials and that they were built much earlier in our history and probably not by Egyptians. Who knows, but could be true and there is a ton of information out there that supports that. More is being discovered all the time about ancient civilizations that existed on our planet far earlier than we have proven so far. Why not since the earth is several billion years old. Maybe we carry the preference for geometric shapes genetically. Very deep and convoluted subject indeed and not sure that there is a specific answer and the more you research the deeper it gets!