Dysfunction

The mariner can be quiet no longer. On the one hand, he is pleased that the tea party conservatives have disrupted the greedy, do-nothing, teat-sucking plutocrats of both houses of Congress. It is about time ideology became an element of government decision making. It is unfortunate that the ideology is extremely populist. The tea party call to arms aims to dismantle a modern government, albeit largely dysfunctional, that reflects modern society, manages modern financial reality for the nation, responds to international issues that are complex, requires funding and quid pro quo relationships.

Further, on the brink of a global disaster that requires the best of every nation working together to defeat global warming – an issue that is no longer politically debatable – populism is too myopic to manage the future of the world.

On the other hand, the teat-sucking regulars of both parties are defending the current concept of government by lobbyist and refuse to bow to the tea party desire for a 1920 era government. While the regulars may have their own licentious interests at heart, one must accept the old saying that one’s enemy’s enemy is one’s friend.

What the tea party fails to give credence to is the diversity of life, need, priority, and ideology that constitutes the American experience. Like the tagline from “Naked City” (1950’s), “There are 8 million stories in the naked city…,” there are 380 million stories in the United States – few of them, if any, are identical. The tea party forgot that part.

Neither the tea party nor the political regulars have the best interest of the American citizen at heart. This lack of interest in the citizen has led both sides down a long, multi-year path to the point of no return. Each side has boxed themselves into a corner where neither side can consider the well-being of the nation but rather are like two bulls horn to horn, death to death. We will pay for the show.

Did you know that state politics have become so polarized – and reinforce that polarization by abusive gerrymandering – that it takes only eight tossup states to decide the winner in a Federal election?

The centrists do not get off free. The tea partiers, the feminists, the occupy Wall Street folks, and all the other activists of any stripe each believe in something. They are willing to put their money, their time, their inconvenience, their conviction, where their mouth is. Centrists may ask, What mouth? The activists are not afraid to suffer name-calling. They believe in something and try to do something about their beliefs. Not so with the centrists. They want life to be so-so, undisrupted, just let them eat out on Fridays and cut the grass on Saturdays. So the United States gets fed to left and right extremists, forcing more dysfunction and expense on the public.

The last word: If as many voters showed up for every primary and voted in every non-Presidential election as voters who vote in a Presidential election, the nation would be a truly different nation – and for the better. There’s no such thing as an independent voter.

Ancient Mariner

Guns

The tumultuous debate recently about gun registration prompted the mariner to think about the American culture, a culture that defends – if not encourages – every citizen to own a gun. Some state legislatures have validated the right to carry concealed weapons anywhere. In the Wild West, even bars and grocery stores said to hang guns outside the establishment. Now, only metal detectors force a citizen to part with their alter ego – the gun.

Current reasons, brandished about one might say, are to defend one’s self against the government (a long standing paranoia), defend one’s self against others who would do harm (in the gun owner’s opinion), and to hunt (with semi-automatic weapons that require little marksmanship to kill the prey).

Oddly enough, handguns are the most deadly, killing 30,000 victims per year.

What other countries around the world suggest that every citizen be armed? The mariner can think of two or three ravaged and war torn countries in Africa and Madagascar where citizens best be armed or die. There are some countries in Central and South America where it may be better to have a weapon in the closet for one’s safety.

However, no other country values the gun in a sacrosanct way. That is true only in the United States. Intellectually, the gun issue is rooted in American history and has been a part not only of citizen regard but of national regard as well. A problem is solved with guns. Shoot first, negotiate later. It is the sacrosanct element of gun ownership that motivated the mariner to research American history.

The first significant use of guns included hunting for food and killing tens of thousands of Indians – who did not even own guns until well into the white person’s policy of genocide.

So guns cleared the west, making it safe for white people. But only for a while. Then the Mexicans became an issue when whites moved into the territory of Mexico. The United States won the shoot out because there were not enough Mexicans. Again, our country was forged with guns.

The American Revolution quickly moved from tariffs to guns from 1776 to 1815. The British came, marching up and down the East Coast, the Gulf States, and through Canada. With the help of French guns and warships, the thirteen original colonies were created through the din of gunfire. Less than fifty years later, the United States decided to fight among themselves, killing 364,511 citizens – not counting innocent murders, rapes and stealing the assets of every home that fell victim to either side.

It can be said that the Spanish American War was an opportunity for Americans to use their guns. The Spanish were in no position to defend their holdings. “Remember the Maine” was a dubious reason to pull out our guns.

Throughout American history all the way to the present, the American Government has had a guns first diplomacy. It is no wonder that guns seem to be a natural right for every American citizen. Below is a chart of the gun history of the United States. The mariner notes that it does not include the Grenada invasion (Reagan’s war and a good role for Clint Eastwood in “Heartbreak Hill.”) Also not noted in the World War II statistics is a deliberate bombing policy by the Allied Forces who knew beforehand more than 200,000 civilians would die in the process.

        Total   Casualties as of May 27, 2013

Total     Serving

Battle Deaths

Other     Deaths Total     Deaths Wounded Pct     Killed
  Revolutionary     War

4,435

4,435

6,188

0

War     of 1812

286,730

2,260

2,260

4,505

0.79%

Mexican     War

78,718

1,733

11,550

13,283

4,152

16.87%

Civil     War

2,213,363

140,414

224,097

364,511

281,881

16.47%

Spanish     American

306,760

385

2,061

2,446

1,662

0.80%

World     War I

4,734,991

53,202

63,114

116,316

204,002

2.46%

World     War II

16,112,566

291,557

113,842

405,399

670,846

2.52%

Korean     War

5,720,000

33,746

3,249

36,995

103,284

0.65%

Vietnam     War

8,744,000

47,355

10,796

58,151

153,303

0.67%

Desert     Storm

2,225,000

147

235

382

467

0.02%

Enduring     Freedom

1784

318

2.286

9,675

0

Iraqi     Freedom

3483

890

4,422

31,935

0

Totals

580,182

430,370

1,010,876

14,781,096

 

Add to the belligerent history of the United States other wars, more or less gunless. The war against the poor and non-white populations exacerbated by two recent decisions by the Supreme Court: money can vote and negating the 1965 Civil Rights Act. There is the war between plutocrats and the rest of the population. Similar to the Mexicans in the Mexican War, the rest of the population may lose because it has little money to fight back.

The United State has a harsh, win-first philosophy underlying its culture. Our history has forged this harshness. We should be careful to keep gun policies separate from other aggressive environments. “Stand your Ground” and carrying concealed weapons both are examples of ‘crossing the line’ as well as deliberate profiling with no other reason but skin color, which eventually will involve more than the occasional gun battle.

Americans like to be aggressive; it is a good trait – but not with gun in hand.

Ancient Mariner